On 01/06/2017 02:23 PM, Ted Felix wrote: > If a class no longer derives from QObject, is it OK to change all the > tr() calls to QObject::tr() calls? Or would it be better to retain the > derivation from QObject (ugly as that may be)?
The update tool USUALLY does a pretty good job of recycling identical translations that have merely changed contexts. The translator just has to skim along and confirm them. This isn't a large burden. Feel free to do what makes sense in the code, and I'll help make sure the translations are still working afterwards. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
