On 3/30/21 7:52 AM, Ted Felix wrote:
Still, I should probably re-run against the root dir just for fun to see what it looks like and how long it takes.
Just did that. Oddly it took less time. Only one hour instead of two. I'm guessing that the missing history caused it to jump around and try rescanning branches to merge. The size is about the same at 139MB. Actually, I think that's a little bit smaller. There are also only 13010 commits. But it appears to have at least partial code all the way back to r12.
This might be really handy for code archaeology. But having the code down in a "rosegarden" directory is a little odd.
There's still time to switch to this if anyone feels strongly that this is the right way to go.
Lot of ideas are coming to mind. E.g. we could do this full convert, then delete the website and other stuff and move the source directories where they belong. That might be better than what I've done. But working with older versions will be strange in git since the source will move. I need to think about this for a bit.
Thoughts? Ted. _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
