On 3/30/21 7:02 PM, Richard Bown wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 15:44, Philip Leishman <leish...@web.de <mailto:leish...@web.de>> wrote: We had some experience at work converting repositories (actually from clearcase). Sometimes it was better to drop a lot of the old history. Ditto (re: Clearcase) and ditto re: your advice. As to work flow. I think working with forked repositories is good. Sounds good to me. I've been trying to summon up the courage to look at the Windows RG port again but because it was always in a completely separate (github) repo with a different file structure (to accomodate qmake) I'm rarely/never motivated to have a go at it. Perhaps with this new git start I can work out a way... although I fear the qmake workflow and layout (which I much prefer) will also be a blocker. R
Qt seems to be moving away from qmake and going to cmake.See https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6-build-system. In the qt6 technical vision they say "We will continue to support our users on QMake, but not develop it further or use it to build the Qt framework itself." One of the strengths of cmake is the cross platform capability. It may be worth trying it on windows !! Philip
_______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
