On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Chris Edwards wrote: > I wondered if it might be a problem with unusually-named LADSPA plugins, > so I also tried unsetting LADSPA_PATH (`export LADSPA_PATH=`) before > running, and checked that `listplugins` listed no plugins, but it made > no difference.
Well crap. That's exactly what I would have suggested to try. We should be able to rule out a lot of things since I'm also running Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit, and that rules out basically everything else I might have suspected. I have no clue what the problem is, and the only thing I can think to suggest is the brute force workaround of building without LADSPA support. This will require hacking the makefile or something similarly ugly, as we discontinued support for conditional builds. If you can't work out how to do it, I'll have to play with it a minute and get back to you. I don't have time to glance that way just now. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
