On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Chris Edwards wrote:

> Actually, it looks like Rosegarden was finding plugins in spite of my
> efforts to hide them. :)

Ahhhhh.  That's where I get caught in a half truth when I say that's "exactly 
what I would have suggested" then.  I normally try to achieve the same end by 
physically hiding the plugins from Rosegarden, and I guess that's still the 
way to do it.

> The culprits turned out to be a couple of plugins that I'd written
> myself: having moved them out of the plugin directory, Rosegarden now
> runs.  Oddly, other programs using LADSPA plugins (e.g. Ardour) have
> never had problems with them, but there's probably something stupid I've
> done in the plugin implementations.

I don't know what the common trait is, but there have been a few plugins that 
caused Rosegarden to hang or segfault.  I think they're not properly thread 
safe or something, but it's been so long I misremember the details.

It's greatly reassuring that specific plugins caused this problem for you.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

Reply via email to