On 05/12/11 02:53, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Chris Edwards wrote: > >> I wondered if it might be a problem with unusually-named LADSPA plugins, >> so I also tried unsetting LADSPA_PATH (`export LADSPA_PATH=`) before >> running, and checked that `listplugins` listed no plugins, but it made >> no difference. > Well crap. That's exactly what I would have suggested to try.
Actually, it looks like Rosegarden was finding plugins in spite of my efforts to hide them. :) I added some extra code to print what (if any) plugins it was trying to load, and it was finding some in the following paths: /usr/local/lib/ladspa /usr/lib/ladspa The culprits turned out to be a couple of plugins that I'd written myself: having moved them out of the plugin directory, Rosegarden now runs. Oddly, other programs using LADSPA plugins (e.g. Ardour) have never had problems with them, but there's probably something stupid I've done in the plugin implementations. Sorry for the little wild goose chase! Thanks, Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
