On 09/29/2012 11:11 AM, Abrolag wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:26:03 -0400 > "D. Michael McIntyre"<[email protected]> wrote: >> Rosegarden has stretched the limits of what is possible quite a long >> way, but at the core, trying to do full featured notation on top of a >> sequencer is just nuts. That has to be why no commercial developer has >> ever tried it. It's a labor founded on twin pillars of love and not >> being wrapped too tight. > > Then I shall happily be nuts alongside Rosegarden. In spite of my occasional > gripes and grumbles I wouldn't want to be without it!
Me, neither. I've tried some other notation editors, and they're poor sequencers. (And usually have problems playing back, too.) Rosegarden's the best! -- David [email protected] authenticity, honesty, community http://clanjones.org/david/ http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
