On Sun, 12 May 2019 19:51:54 -0400 Ted Felix <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/3/19 5:06 AM, Will Godfrey wrote: >> I haven't forgotten this - I'm still totally bogged down with work on >> Yoshimi. >> There is a *lot* going on! > > Just pushed r15492 which was a memory access issue related to >deleting segments and the segment parameter box. This may have fixed >the problem. > >Ted. Just tried to compile this, and it fails with the report: error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘QSharedPointer<Rosegarden::NoteStyle>’ and ‘std::nullptr_t’) m_baseStyle = nullptr; What is really odd is that build 15419 compiled without issues. As far as I can see the only difference between now and then (on my computer) is a number of system updates fetched from debian. My understanding is that nullptr is the 'modern' replacement for NULL, so I can't see why it would fail. As a cross-check I tried changing a few old-style NULL with nullptr in Yoshimi, and it compiled without complaint, so I'm quite lost now :( -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
