routing  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: Supporting Certification in the Healthcare CPP Fody, Kenneth W.
• FW: IBM's IP statement to OASIS Rachel Foerster
• FW: IBM and ebXML dalegibbs
  • RE: IBM and ebXML David Frenkel
• FW: [ebxml-dev] IBM's IP statement to OASIS Rachel Foerster
• FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Rachel Foerster
  • Re: FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: FW: IBM patents issue response (from ebXML JCC) Rachel Foerster
• FW: [ebxml-dev] Anyone else rather perturbed by IBM's recent announcement.... Rachel Foerster
• Please take me off all of your listgroups Ann . M . Hale
• Re: IBM ebXML patent claim Kepa Zubeldia
  • RE: IBM ebXML patent claim Rachel Foerster
  • Re: IBM ebXML patent claim William J. Kammerer
• ebXML Register in Beta Release Rachel Foerster
• When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Dave Minch
  • Re: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: When is a CH a payer, or provider, for that matter? Dave Minch
• Re: Why do we flap our lips so much about the ISA Receiver ID? William J. Kammerer
• RE: A proposed work plan for this group Rachel Foerster
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
  • FW: A proposed work plan for this group dalegibbs
  • Why do we flap our lips so much about the ISA Receiver ID? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: FW: A proposed work plan for this group Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Supporting aggregation can be made a first-class feature of our CPP William J. Kammerer
  • RE: A proposed work plan for this group Dave Minch
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group Bruce . Horn
• Interchange ID Qualifier William J. Kammerer
• Direct Submissions from Providers doug . renshaw
  • RE: Direct Submissions from Providers David Frenkel
• Re: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption David Frenkel
  • RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption Ajay K sanghi
  • RE: Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption Ajay K sanghi
  • Routing & ID Workgroup Assumption doug . renshaw
• RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
  • I've yet to see any call for "special needs" on the part of Clearinghouses William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Rachel Foerster
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Rachel Foerster
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ajay K sanghi
• Is encryption necessary for the transmission of transactions and images? angela . maher
• RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ed Hafner
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ajay K sanghi
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Ed Hafner
  • RE: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• Voice of Reason Dave Minch
  • Re: Voice of Reason Mimi Hart
  • RE: Voice of Reason Dave Minch
• RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Fody, Kenneth W.
  • RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Dave Minch
  • FW: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Dave Minch
  • Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
  • Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
  • Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? William J. Kammerer
  • A proposed work plan for this group Rachel Foerster
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
  • RE: A proposed work plan for this group Ajay K sanghi
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
  • RE: A proposed work plan for this group Ajay K sanghi
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group William J. Kammerer
  • Re: A proposed work plan for this group Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
  • Re: Who am I? Sender, Receiver, Intermediary, or just plain Chump? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Ronald Bowron
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Rachel Foerster
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Dave Minch
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Robert Huffman
  • I see no reason to act as if this practice is offensive. William J. Kammerer
• Ride Share to HIPAA-COW 4/12/02? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• RE: Update on CPP effort. Fody, Kenneth W.
  • Re: Update on CPP effort. William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Update on CPP effort. Dick Brooks
  • RE: Update on CPP effort. Fody, Kenneth W.
• What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
  • Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
  • Update on CPP effort. Dick Brooks
  • Re: Update on CPP effort. William J. Kammerer
• using DDE infrastructure as a formal transport mechanism for EDI messages Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Quinkert, Lin
• Companion Guides as Proprietary Company Confidential Information? William J. Kammerer
• Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Fody, Kenneth W.
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • FYI - Statistical info David Frenkel
  • RE: FYI - Statistical info Rachel Foerster
  • RE: FYI - Statistical info David Frenkel
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? David Frenkel
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Dave Minch
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
  • Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: What's the focus? Rachel Foerster
  • Re: What's the focus? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: What's the focus? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: What's the focus? David Frenkel
  • RE: What's the focus?[ID to be used as "key" to the CPP registry] Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: What's the focus?[ID to be used as "key" to the CPP registry] David Frenkel
  • A Rose By Any Other Name... William J. Kammerer
  • Re: A Rose By Any Other Name... Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Healthcare CPP registry services William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Fody, Kenneth W.
  • RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? David Frenkel
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? Kepa Zubeldia
  • Re: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Are only 15 characters in the ISA receiver ID enough? David Frenkel
  • How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? David Frenkel
  • Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? joe mcverry
  • Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? joe mcverry
  • RE: How can we treat real time as a secondary issue? Rachel Foerster
  • Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the same way? Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers William J. Kammerer
  • RE: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Rachel Foerster
  • HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... William J. Kammerer
  • RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Rachel Foerster
  • Re: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... William J. Kammerer
  • RE: HIN numbers: I'll show you mine if you show me yours.... Rachel Foerster
  • Re: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers joe mcverry
  • Say, why do you think UDDI sucks? William J. Kammerer
  • Re: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
  • RE: More Stuff and Questions on Routing Identifiers Dave Minch
• ebXML Registry William J. Kammerer
  • IBM drops Internet patent bombshell David Frenkel
  • Internet David Frenkel
  • RE: ebXML Registry Dave Minch
• Call For Speakers Melissa Wittenberg
• RE: Medicare and Medicaid paper claims Rachel Foerster
• FW: Four Vendors Complete ebXML Messaging vs 2.0 Interoperability Pilot Rachel Foerster
  • Discovery of WEDi/SNIP CPPs using the OASIS ebXML Registry William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Discovery of WEDi/SNIP CPPs using the OASIS ebXML Registry Rachel Foerster
• The ID & Routing teleconference planned for 03-22 (Friday) 1:30 - 2:30 EST has been cancelled. William J. Kammerer
• TPA Discovery as seen by the developer (redux) Michael Mattias/Tal Systems
• TPA Discovery as seen by the developer PPPS_INFO
• Identifiers William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Identifiers John Bristor
  • Re: Identifiers William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Identifiers John Bristor
  • Sample Data, De-Identification Software and e-mail Digital IDs William J. Kammerer
• Fw: [EDI-L] <MISC> Pet Peeve William J. Kammerer
• Today's WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Today's WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call Ronald Bowron
• WEDi/AFEHCT Communication Interoperability Project Industry Survey Workgroup Charter William J. Kammerer
• Re: [ebxml-cppa] WEDi/SNIP Electronic Trading Partner Agreements for HIPAA William J. Kammerer
• FYI - Inroduction of the WEDi/SNIP e-TPA to the OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and Agreement Technical Committee William J. Kammerer
• FW: Use of the 838 for electronic exchange of TPA data Dave Minch
• FW: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT Dave Minch
  • RE: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT Rachel Foerster
  • Re: Electronic Trading Partner Agreements - 3/5 Conversation with DWT William J. Kammerer
  • WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing teleconference call from 1:30 - 2:30 EST Today William J. Kammerer
• How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Luis E. Cotto
  • Re: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? William J. Kammerer
  • RE: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Dave Minch
  • RE: How's EDI accomplished in HIPAA? Rachel Foerster
• Trading Partner Agreements William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Trading Partner Agreements Kepa Zubeldia
  • Trading Partner Agreements William J. Kammerer
  • RE:Trading Partner Agreements Bruce T LeGrand
  • Re: Trading Partner Agreements William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Trading Partner Agreements Christopher J. Feahr, OD
• RE: Correspondence with Tim Collins re: EDI Addressing Protocols Dave Minch
• Proposed Changes to the 6010 ID & EDI Address Project Org Document William J. Kammerer
• We have another "volunteer"! - this time for the e-TPA "auto-discovery" code using the DNS "Directory" William J. Kammerer
• Schemas for Addresses, contact info, online addresses Rachel Foerster
• Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document William J. Kammerer
  • RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Dick Brooks
  • RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • RE: Twenty-second "elevator" Pitch as Project Purpose in the 6010 document Dick Brooks
• Electronic Trading Partner Agreement "Discovery" William J. Kammerer
• Corrected 6010 and 6320 Papers available at http://www.novannet.com/wedi/ William J. Kammerer
• Please remove me from this ListServ Jeremy . A . Johnson
  • Re: Please remove me from this ListServ William J. Kammerer
• Interesting Information about the ebXML CPP/CPA Specification Rachel Foerster
  • Re: Interesting Information about the ebXML CPP/CPA Specification William J. Kammerer
• Re: Submitter/receiver Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Submitter/receiver Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Submitter/receiver William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Submitter/receiver Christopher J. Feahr, OD
  • Re: Submitter/receiver William J. Kammerer
  • Re: Submitter/receiver Ronald Bowron

• Earlier messages
• Later messages