It actually is a problem, because there is code that exists that is expecting "null" to be valid.
Chad -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: frozen specification Chad Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would it be possible that the current implementation be backwards > compatible? Anyone who was using the helma implementation that had null > support probably has no use for the current implementation, because it > doesn't have null support. Any future changes will remain backwards compatible within major releases (i.e. 1.0 will be compatible with 1.1). Only in major point releases would incompatible changes be considered. I wouldn't worry.
