Chad Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would it be possible that the current implementation be backwards > compatible? Anyone who was using the helma implementation that had null > support probably has no use for the current implementation, because it > doesn't have null support.
Any future changes will remain backwards compatible within major releases (i.e. 1.0 will be compatible with 1.1). Only in major point releases would incompatible changes be considered. I wouldn't worry.
