josh lucas wrote: > 1) Having a very small footprint. Though I might be inclined to have > a 'lite' version which has the necessary compatibility with the > xml-rpc spec and then have a full version with outside dependencies > for apps which don't necessarily need a small footprint. > > 2) Continued xml-rpc compatibility (obviously) > > josh
Some requirements I'd like to see in the full version: - HTTP/1.1 compatibility - Customizable HTTP headers (especially User-Agent) Other things I have seen tossed around on the list that might be useful are of course the introspection and interceptors pieces. Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks
