On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, josh lucas wrote: > Ok, now that we have a few people in a discussion, let's talk about > directions this codebase can go. > > Here are some things which I think are important: > > 1) Having a very small footprint. Though I might be inclined to have a > 'lite' version which has the necessary compatibility with the xml-rpc > spec and then have a full version with outside dependencies for apps > which don't necessarily need a small footprint.
This is especially important to the applet users. I have a feeling that Ryan's integration of HttpClient is going to hose the JDK 1.1 compatibility. For the server, this doesn't seem like such a big issue. What are peoples' thoughts on this? > 2) Continued xml-rpc compatibility (obviously) +1 -- Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
