@torsava commented on this pull request.
> - print('Conflicts:\t{} {} {}'.format(dep.key,
> '==', spec[1]))
+ for dep in dist.requirements_for_extra(extra):
+ for spec in dep.specifier:
+ if spec.operator == '!=':
+ print('Conflicts:\t{} {} {}'.format(dep.name,
'==', spec.version))
else:
- print('Requires:\t{} {} {}'.format(dep.key,
spec[0], spec[1]))
+ print('Requires:\t{} {} {}'.format(dep.name,
spec.operator, spec.version))
@s-t-e-v-e-n-k Here you still use `dep.name` as a replacement for `dep.key`, is
there a reason?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1317#discussion_r493363804_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
