W dniu 12.10.2016 o 16:15, Kevin Kofler pisze: > Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained >> AFAIK. We can't push out a big rebuild of a major library so one, new >> package can be introduced into F24. > > Huh? Upstream says 3.1 is API- and ABI-compatible to 3.0 (with only one > application needed fixing for some reason),
Could you please point me to a reference for this? I looked around a bit but couldn't find one. Thanks! so it should be perfectly > suitable as an update. This is similar to Qt upgrades that have often been > done in Fedora (where there are also a few odd packages that invariably need > rebuilding due to (ab)using private Qt APIs). > > Introducing a second package for the new version is a horrible idea, it will > lead to symbol conflicts (in applications accidentally transitively linking > both versions) and a waste of space. I would just upgrade the existing > package to the new version. > > Kevin Kofler >
