On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 5:21 PM Xavier Bachelot <xav...@bachelot.org> wrote:
> There are missing dependencies for a lot of RPM Fusion packages in EPEL > 9, but I've been filling a lot of bugs for dependencies of the high > profile packages or packages I care about, and even if there's quite a > lot of work remaining, this is not that bad currently. Thanks for the opening of the dependency bugs. I have also been filing bugs (in a number of cases others got there first with the request, but in a few I got there first) and I concur that things are getting better. There is likely to be a long tail for some packages for the reasons you mention. The copr I have been using for building the missing EPEL9 packages for the builds I care about is now down to a half dozen packages, where it started closer to two dozen (some were build dependencies for the others, of course, but they all count(ed) in my mind). Progress! > ... or even worst > when hitting a missing -devel package from Stream. That is one of the painful issues (it is not new, el8 had similar issues, but before the centos 8 vaulting at least the -devel packages were mostly available in the [devel] repo). I, too, have had to open a bug on a missing -devel package and we shall see where it goes. _______________________________________________ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
