> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noel > Chiappa > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG recommendation > > > From: William Herrin <[email protected]> > > >> NAT is now architecture. > > > Concur. > > More accurately, NAT is now part of the deployed base, and as such, is part > of the implicit architecture of said base.
Then, let the heavily NATed deployment remain as the ground floor and we'll build a second story on top of it. Fred [email protected] > Noel > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
