Tony Li allegedly wrote on 11/02/2009 12:35 PM: > > A simple question: what does NAT really have to do with our discussion > about routing architecture?
The discussion has strayed off the path but what I said originally was: > - NAT is now architecture. The IETF needs to decide how much NAT it > wants the Internet to have in the future. This strongly influences > what we do in routing/addressing, because outlying, dwindling cases > (either the NAT ones or the non-NAT ones) can be handled specially. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
