Eliot Lear allegedly wrote on 11/02/2009 9:42 AM: > Bill, > > And my point is this: > > NAT "Security" is not easily answered in a single paragraph, and you > cannot support Scott as such.
Huh? > I can say this: with all of this NAT around, there sure are a VAST > amount of 0wn3d systems out there. How much more would there be without > NAT? I would guess not many. Probably the vast majority of the ones that would be reachable directly without NAT are being taken over by other means already. But this is a digression from the main topic. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
