Somebody argues that LISP is an edge-centric (i.e., CES) solution, then what about LISP-MN? Meanwhile, somebody argues that HIP and RANGI are host-centric (i.e., CEE) solution, then what about HIP proxy and RANGI proxy mechanisms?
IMHO, these two options are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, they should be complementary for each other. Each one is suitable for its corresponding stage of the Internet architecture evolution path. Xiaohu > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Noel > Chiappa > 发送时间: 2010年2月4日 11:32 > 收件人: [email protected] > 抄送: [email protected] > 主题: Re: [rrg] Terminology > > Someone pointed out to me that although I've been using the terms CEE and CES > as synonomous for the terms 'host-centric' and 'edge-centric' (and > 'network-centric' completes the list), that for others they seemingly aren't > exactly synonomous, but subtly different. > > Can someone confirm this, and explain what the differences are? > > I'll be using 'host-centric', etc from now on. My apologies if I have > inadvertently caused any confusion by using them as synonyms for 'host-centric' > and 'edge-centric'. > > Noel > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
