On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:50 -0700, Tony Li wrote: > > We recommend further work on automating renumbering because even with > ILNP, the ability of a domain to change its locators at minimal cost > is fundamentally necessary. No routing architecture will be able to > scale without some form of abstraction, and domains that change their > point of attachment must fundamentally be prepared to change their > locators in line with this abstraction.
I heartily agree that further work on automatic renumbering is needed. However, ILNP could be deployed with ULAs and border locator translation in the edge network, so it would not be strictly accurate to suggest that automatic renumbering technology is a deployment dependency. Regards, // Steve _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
