On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Tony Li wrote:
17.1. Motivation
Without a new routing and addressing architecture, there is a concern
that the cost and structure of the routing architecture as we know it
today would become prohibitively expensive, with repercussions to the
overall growth of the Internet. We need to avoid this and must thus
select some solution and push forward with it.
I know mine is a minority view, given earlier polls here, but I do
think the case for there being a problem isn't quite that settled, on
an evidential basis at least. As such, I think the above ought to
admit just a teeny bit of uncertainty. E.g.:
"There is a general concern that the cost and structure of the
routing architecture as we know it today may become prohibitively
expensive with continued growth, with repercussions to the health
of the Internet. As such, there is an urgent need to examine and
evaluate potential scalability enhancements to it."
However, it's your text. ;)
growth. Our goal should be to make permanent, long-term changes to
the architecture and those changes should be smoothly integrated,
first-class citizens within the architecture.
This is somewhat repeating the immediately previous? Possibly can be
compacted a little.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
It is a wise father that knows his own child.
-- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice"
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
