> >> I heartily agree that further work on automatic renumbering is needed. >> However, ILNP could be deployed with ULAs and border locator translation >> in the edge network, so it would not be strictly accurate to suggest >> that automatic renumbering technology is a deployment dependency. > > > You are correct, it's not a requirement, but there is a large segment who > have religious objections to border locator translation (i.e., NAT). Thus, > some form of renumbering really is a requirement in the long run. > Or use of encapsulation.... ...which could be improved substantially by using routable information rather than just mapable information in the outer header. Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Darrel Lewis <[email protected]> An: Tony Li <[email protected]> Cc: IRTF Routing RG <[email protected]> Verschickt: Di., 20. Apr. 2010, 21:47 Thema: Re: [rrg] Proposal for recommendation language >> >> I heartily agree that further work on automatic renumbering is needed. >> However, ILNP could be deployed with ULAs and border locator translation >> in the edge network, so it would not be strictly accurate to suggest >> that automatic renumbering technology is a deployment dependency. > > > You are correct, it's not a requirement, but there is a large segment who > have religious objections to border locator translation (i.e., NAT). Thus, > some form of renumbering really is a requirement in the long run. > Or use of encapsulation.... -Darrel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
