How would ILNP work with the 32 bits of IPv4 address split between Locator and Identifier? As far as I know, this is not documented anywhere. No one can do magic things, including ILNP. It is a waste of time continuing to debate that ILNP could do anything for solving the IPv4 scalability and depletion issue. 4 bytes are just 4 bytes; you cannot get more than that out of them. Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Robin Whittle <[email protected]> An: RRG <[email protected]> Cc: Ran Atkinson <[email protected]> Verschickt: Fr., 23. Apr. 2010, 15:31 Thema: Re: [rrg] Proposal for recommendation language - ILNP & IPv4 Hi Ran, I will read the paper I think you are referring to: http://www.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/~saleem/papers/2009/milcom2009/milcom2009-abh2009.pdf > Several of us have repeatedly tried to explain to you that the > above was not correct; we've tried both on-list and off-list. No you haven't explained anything. You just asserted without any explanation. You haven't supplied an explanation yet - but you have pointed to a paper which apparently contains an explanation. How would ILNP work with the 32 bits of IPv4 address split between Locator and Identifier? As far as I know, this is not documented anywhere. > (I had thought this was NOT a debating society.) This is not a society, but if you want your ideas to be properly understood and respected - and if you want to find out any shortcomings they may have - then you will debate them patiently and in detail with people who provide critiques. Debate involves arguments and evidence, not unsupported assertions and casting aspersions on other people and their supposed lack of understanding. > There is a difference between (A) one person disagreeing > (or not understanding) part of a proposal and (B) the > proposal actually having the issue that person claims. > This topic seems to be (A). I will respond after I have read the above paper and after you explain how ILNP's Locator and Identifier bit fields are implemented in IPv4 packets. They are 64 bits each in IPv6. - Robin _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
