Noel, I've compromised on this wording. Please see the next version, as soon as I can get to it.
We ended up as co-chairs because we were the ones who kept complaining to the IAB that we needed to do something. The squeaky wheel, and all that... Tony On 4/22/10 8:31 AM, "Noel Chiappa" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Tony Li <[email protected]> > >> I promised to draft some text including some rationale for the >> recommendation. I'm attaching a first draft here. >> ... >> On behalf of the routing research group > > Someone pointed this phrasing out to me (I hadn't noticed it), and I really > don't like it. If nothing else, it can sound patronizing, like the rest of us > are a bunch of small kids, and the grown-ups are acting on our behalf. > > Look, you and Lixia didn't wind up as co-chairs because you're 2 times > smarter than the rest of us, you wound up as co-chairs because, well, I'm not > sure how, but not because you're more likely to have the correct answer. > > I understand that the rules of the RRG mean you get to put whatever you want > in the document, but this entire recommendation section needs to avoid _any_ > suggestion that it's _anything but_ the opinion of the two people who > happened to wind up as co-chairs. It's certainly not on _my_ behalf. > > Noel _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
