На Friday 07 May 2010 22:40:28 [email protected] написа: > Toni, > I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. >
Heiner, Currently inter-domain routing is based on IP address prefixes, which are intra-domain context, and on AS number paths. The simple and scalable model is the inter-domain routes to be only AS paths. Toni > > Heiner > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Toni Stoev <[email protected]> > An: IRTF RRG > <[email protected]>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing > Verschickt: Fr., 7. Mai. 2010, 0:41 > Thema: Re: [rrg] RG futures > > > On Thursday 06 May 2010 12:02:39 [email protected] sent: > > > > How about an honest discussion that deals with the real causes of the > scalability problem! > > The scalability (size) issue only unveils how miserably bad the (most > important) IETF routing paradigms are. Particularly: > ... > > Heiner > > Intra-domain routing is as simple as node location naming follows topology. > > Inter-domain routing has issues with intra-domain context – route > identification > prefixes based on intra-domain identity/location naming, so called addresses. > Inter-domain routing has issues with route destination/endpoint ambiguity – > what > an inter-domain route leads to, node(s) or autonomous system? > > Regards to all. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
