Like... o Packets would be appended by an AS number of the destination at exiting its own AS.
o DFZ routers sees only AS numbers in determining the next hop router. o The destination IP address would be examined only after the packet has entered the destination AS. Regards, DY On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Dae Young KIM <[email protected]> wrote: > This sounds similar to an idea I raised some months ago; inter-domain > routing based on AS numbers. > > Some people were criticizing that AS's are not of equal scales (from a > tiny one to a global scale) and that it is not a useful/practical > granularity. > > Studying the IRON, the enterprise also can be as small as SOHO and as > big as the entire global Internet. Not much different. > > Then why not try an inter-domain routing (solely) based on AS numbers? > > Nonsense? > > Regards, > DY > > > > On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Toni Stoev <[email protected]> wrote: >> На Friday 07 May 2010 22:40:28 [email protected] написа: >>> Toni, >>> I am sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. >>> >> >> Heiner, >> >> Currently inter-domain routing is based on IP address prefixes, which are >> intra-domain context, and on AS number paths. >> The simple and scalable model is the inter-domain routes to be only AS paths. >> >> Toni >> >>> >>> Heiner >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- >>> Von: Toni Stoev <[email protected]> >>> An: IRTF RRG >>> <[email protected]>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing >>> Verschickt: Fr., 7. Mai. 2010, 0:41 >>> Thema: Re: [rrg] RG futures >>> >>> >>> On Thursday 06 May 2010 12:02:39 [email protected] sent: >>> > >>> > How about an honest discussion that deals with the real causes of the >>> scalability problem! >>> > The scalability (size) issue only unveils how miserably bad the (most >>> important) IETF routing paradigms are. Particularly: >>> ... >>> > Heiner >>> >>> Intra-domain routing is as simple as node location naming follows topology. >>> >>> Inter-domain routing has issues with intra-domain context – route >>> identification >>> prefixes based on intra-domain identity/location naming, so called >>> addresses. >>> Inter-domain routing has issues with route destination/endpoint ambiguity – >>> what >>> an inter-domain route leads to, node(s) or autonomous system? >>> >>> Regards to all. >> _______________________________________________ >> rrg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg >> > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
