s/EID's numerical representation/EID's + numerical representation/

Sorry missed the "+"

R.


Hi DY,

Just for the record Enke Chen and myself have came up with this idea as
well about ... 4 years ago :)

There are number of written documents we have on this. You can easily
google for it to see where is has been proposed before (even in this WG):

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg03174.html

The main part of our proposal was that all transit ASes do not need to
be upgraded as IP header would contain plane old IPv4 address
constructed from AS number. Also all destination ASBRs would
automatically recognize this address and decapsulate.

But our primary focus was not too address "melting Internet" ... our
focus was to provide a means and ability to provide fast connectivity
restoration aka PIC but in the inter-as scope (so far it works well
intra-as).

The mapping plane for it comes for free ... each BGP update carries the
origin AS today .. now we can even RPKI validate it - to eliminate
manual mistakes. Soon we will also extend current origin validation to
make it even more secure.

Clearly the deployment price to pay would be to carry AS host routes oh
well ... perhaps additional 30K routes more in the Internet if everyone
suddenly would participate.

But where and what is the benefit ...... The benefit would be only
feasible if for a given network all of it's customers and transits start
sending AS IP address encapsulated packets. Otherwise you still need to
keep all addresses in control plane as well as put all addresses in the
FIB.

But now that we have ILNP on the table I am just thinking loud here ...
if DNS record could return us not the locator or set of locators, but
EID's numerical representation of an AS number hosts which support it
could easily encap it this way while in the inner header still contain
today's IP address of the given server.

So here is more of the question to ILNP authors if they have considered
such option ....

Many thx,
R.


_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to