Dae Young, Nice to hear from you.
> o Packets would be appended by an AS number of the destination at > exiting its own AS. Packets would need to be globally destined at sending. Destination "AS number + intra-domain locator" is just fine. So destination AS number should be set initially in the packet. This is quite end-to-end, right? > o DFZ routers sees only AS numbers in determining the next hop router. OK. > o The destination IP address would be examined only after the packet > has entered the destination AS. Let's say "locator" instead of "IP address". > RFC1955 by Bob Hinden back in 1996... > Curious to know why this was rejected in IPNG? I'm not curious about past rejections, but if you know there's any good essence for our creativity, say it please. Heiner, > What value is provided by the orthogonality between intra- and inter-domain > routing? Independent inter-/intra-domain routing scalability. Are you a proponent? Best regards to you both. Cheers listeners. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
