Toni, See below.
Regards, DY On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Toni Stoev <[email protected]> wrote: > Dae Young, > > Nice to hear from you. > >> o Packets would be appended by an AS number of the destination at >> exiting its own AS. > > Packets would need to be globally destined at sending. Destination "AS number > + intra-domain locator" is just fine. So destination AS number should be set > initially in the packet. This is quite end-to-end, right? Yes, DNS query would return 'AS number + intra-domain locator'. > >> o DFZ routers sees only AS numbers in determining the next hop router. > > OK. > >> o The destination IP address would be examined only after the packet >> has entered the destination AS. > > Let's say "locator" instead of "IP address". OK, no problem. > >> RFC1955 by Bob Hinden back in 1996... >> Curious to know why this was rejected in IPNG? > > I'm not curious about past rejections, but if you know there's any good > essence for our creativity, say it please. Yes, this is the simplest scenario I can think of. Almost nothing changes except: o Packets would be appended by AS numbers from outset. o Inter-domain routing works on AS numbers. > > Heiner, > >> What value is provided by the orthogonality between intra- and inter-domain >> routing? > > Independent inter-/intra-domain routing scalability. > > Are you a proponent? > > Best regards to you both. > Cheers listeners. > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
