On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Dae Young KIM <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let's say "locator" instead of "IP address". > > OK, no problem.
I think I have a problem here. As you know, ILNP also uses the terminology 'locator', but there it rather means something more like (domain) network prefix or even like domain ID. You know, the problem is people seem to use the same wording/terminology for different meaning. As long as we're not going to be so extreme to get rid of the IP addresses also, calling it 'IP address', be it IPv4 or IPv6, would be less confusing than using 'locator' in our discussion. This is also what Bob Hinden used in his description. -- Regards, DY _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
