Hello;
On May 17, 2010, at 2:39 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote:
This is another straw poll for the IRTF Routing RG.
There are 4 statements below. IRTF Routing RG members
are free to vote on each. This poll ends 7 days from the
date/time stamp on this email.
Votes are EITHER "Yes" which means "I can tolerate this
statement, even if the wording is not ideal" XOR
"No" which means I cannot tolerate this statement and
disagree with it.
Each statement should be evaluated by itself,
based ONLY on the words below within each statement.
I will NOT be modifying the statement wording during this poll.
That's fine, but I will point out that, in order
- there is one statement of belief, where who is doing the believing
is not specified.
- there are 2 statements about RG consensus (or not)
- there is one statement of fact (or not) and
so they should not be compared against each other.
Also, I do not think that #1 is well posed as written, and "voted"
against it, even though I have no doubt
that there are people who believe it, because I am also sure that
there are people who do not believe it.
Regards
Marshall
(1) "The Internet continuing down the current architectural path,
whereby site multi-homing increases the size/entropy of
the DFZ RIB/FIB, is not believed to be scalable or viable."
(2) "The RG has rough consensus that separating identity from
location is desirable and technically feasible. However,
the RG does NOT have consensus on the best engineering
approach to such an identity/location split."
(3) "The RG has consensus that the Internet needs to support
multi-homing in a manner that scales well and does not have
prohibitive costs."
(4) "Any IETF solution to Internet scaling has to not only support
multi-homing, but address the real-world constraints of the
end customers (large and small)."
Doodle URL for this poll:
<http://www.doodle.com/z5s9yq8kt73eua9t>
(I'll vote formally, but I believe all 4 statements are valid.)
Thanks,
Ran
[email protected]
PS: I'm obliged to Scott B, Noel C, Joel H, & Eliot L for their
inputs
about candidate statements to poll, but they ought not be blamed if
one dislikes how the 4 statements above were worded or what a given
statement says.
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
