(2) consists of two sentences. What if one disagrees either of the two. I voted NO to (2) since I don't agree to the first sentence.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:39 AM, RJ Atkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is another straw poll for the IRTF Routing RG. > > There are 4 statements below. IRTF Routing RG members > are free to vote on each. This poll ends 7 days from the > date/time stamp on this email. > > Votes are EITHER "Yes" which means "I can tolerate this > statement, even if the wording is not ideal" XOR > "No" which means I cannot tolerate this statement and > disagree with it. > > Each statement should be evaluated by itself, > based ONLY on the words below within each statement. > > I will NOT be modifying the statement wording during this poll. > > > (1) "The Internet continuing down the current architectural path, > whereby site multi-homing increases the size/entropy of > the DFZ RIB/FIB, is not believed to be scalable or viable." > > (2) "The RG has rough consensus that separating identity from > location is desirable and technically feasible. However, > the RG does NOT have consensus on the best engineering > approach to such an identity/location split." > > (3) "The RG has consensus that the Internet needs to support > multi-homing in a manner that scales well and does not have > prohibitive costs." > > (4) "Any IETF solution to Internet scaling has to not only support > multi-homing, but address the real-world constraints of the > end customers (large and small)." > > > Doodle URL for this poll: > <http://www.doodle.com/z5s9yq8kt73eua9t> > > > (I'll vote formally, but I believe all 4 statements are valid.) > > Thanks, > > Ran > [email protected] > > PS: I'm obliged to Scott B, Noel C, Joel H, & Eliot L for their inputs > about candidate statements to poll, but they ought not be blamed if > one dislikes how the 4 statements above were worded or what a given > statement says. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > -- Regards, DY _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
