Perhaps, you mean two routings (intra- and inter-) are decoupled or orthogonal?
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Dae Young KIM <[email protected]> wrote: > Toni, > > (Call me DY, which should be easier for you.) > > Before indulging into voting, let me give a question about Statement > 2. I don't fully get what you'd mean by that: > > 2. Inter-domain routing shall be based on intra-domain routing as a service. > > Would you elaborate on it more, please? > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Toni Stoev <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dae Young, fellow researchers, >> >> Let me formulate two basic statements out of the recent discussion: >> >> 1. "Node" is the proper granularity unit for an intra-domain routing point. >> >> Presuming that inter-domain routing is based on routing domains as >> inter-domain routing points: >> >> 2. Inter-domain routing shall be based on intra-domain routing as a service. >> >> This allows for inter-domainly transparent intra-domain routing as well as >> for intra-domain traffic engineering. >> >> Do you agree with the statements? >> >> http://www.doodle.com/8g5857qvudsnwquf >> >> Regards >> Toni >> _______________________________________________ >> rrg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg >> > > > > -- > > Regards, > DY > -- DY _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
