In einer eMail vom 24.05.2010 18:09:39 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]:
Dear Heiner, На Monday 24 May 2010 в 10:50:20 [email protected] изпрати: > Toni, > Generally, sophisticated terminology does not replace a solution. > But is a step that way. Hopefully:-) > > Specifically, I don't know what statement 1 is going after or what relevance it has at all. > Choosing node as routing point in packet exchange is going after defining locator meaning and utilization. This relates to distinction in asset naming for location reaching and identity recognition. > > Statement 2: I am inclined to agree in view of TARA. But I am sure you mean something else, hence have to disagree. > If I would travel from Austria to Netherlands, should I traverse Germany and how? Sure, taking the German Autobahns where there is no speed limit > > Therefore I obstain from voting. > Heiner > I would go to RIPE NCC. ??? Heiner > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Toni Stoev <[email protected]> > An: IRTF RRG <[email protected]> > Verschickt: Mo., 24. Mai. 2010, 0:49 > Thema: [rrg] The Proper Granularity > > > Dae Young, fellow researchers, > > Let me formulate two basic statements out of the recent discussion: > > 1. "Node" is the proper granularity unit for an intra-domain routing point. > > Presuming that inter-domain routing is based on routing domains as inter-domain > routing points: > > 2. Inter-domain routing shall be based on intra-domain routing as a service. > > This allows for inter-domainly transparent intra-domain routing as well as for > intra-domain traffic engineering. > > Do you agree with the statements? > > http://www.doodle.com/8g5857qvudsnwquf > > Regards > Toni > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > > > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
