On Monday 31 May 2010 at 08:07:45 Tony Li sent: > > On 5/23/10 3:49 PM, "Toni Stoev" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dae Young, fellow researchers, > > > > Let me formulate two basic statements out of the recent discussion: > > > > 1. "Node" is the proper granularity unit for an intra-domain routing point. > > > > Presuming that inter-domain routing is based on routing domains as > > inter-domain routing points: > > > > 2. Inter-domain routing shall be based on intra-domain routing as a service. > > > > This allows for inter-domainly transparent intra-domain routing as well as > > for > > intra-domain traffic engineering. > > > > Do you agree with the statements? > > > > http://www.doodle.com/8g5857qvudsnwquf > > > This poll has now run a week. There are four respondents. Both statements > got 2 agreements, so this does not appear to be rough consensus.
Smooth parity withstands. I am deducing to ask research folks whether routing point granualrity matters to routing scalability. > Tony Thanks Toni _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
