On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, RJ Atkinson wrote:
On 17 Jun 2010, at 11:19 , Paul Jakma wrote:I don't think ILNP changes the notion of "locator" at all. The "address" continues to have a topological component as far as routing is concerned.Disagree. ILNP does NOT have the concept of an 'address'.
Sure, ILNP does not. As per the docs though, ILNP is an end-host technology. Intermediate routers continue to treat the packets as IP, and in that context it is not inappropriate to call that field an address.
I could be sarcastic and say that should be obvious, but I'm not sure sarcasm helps greatly in promoting productive discourse ;).
With 1 exception, all papers there already *are* direct links to local copies of the PDFs concerned.
So the plural quoted above ("links") seems to have been a typo.
Ha, my bad. However, the most recent paper there is the paywalled link. FWIW, this doesn't affect me, but it may affect others.
As discussed before on this list, that one link (to Springer-Verlag) is for a journal paper that the authors' can NOT put out directly, due to legal (e.g. copyright) restrictions from the journal publisher.
Sounds like a journal to avoid so. ;) thanks, -- Paul Jakma [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: "No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
