In einer eMail vom 17.06.2010 21:55:19 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt [email protected]:
On 17 Jun 2010, at 15:03 , Paul Jakma wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Tony Li wrote: >> In order for ILNP to be backward compatible and interoperable with legacy IPv6 hosts, it must use the exact same namespace. > > The exact same, or a subset? Anyway.. Exactly the same. Ran Every potential solution MUST be backwards compatible, but this does not imply that it cannot come up with a different namespace. ILNP's dependency on using the current IPv6 namespace is rather a reason for being grounded than for flying (that's what RFC4984 expresses too). Heiner
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
