[ Folks, PLEASE limit oneself to 1 issue per thread. If one has multiple issues, please put them in separate email messages with distinct Subject: lines. I'm trying to separate things as I go along, but it is simpler for everyone on the list if they begin life as separate email threads. :-]
On 17 Jun 2010, at 15:03 , Paul Jakma wrote: > What happens when IPs are re-used for hosts? Can you rely on Locator Updates > reaching those other hosts that are caching things. I don't understand the question. > It'd be interesting if someone did a comparison > between Shim6 and ILNP, as Shim6 spent a fair bit > of effort on looking at issues involving maintaining > the locator<->ULP ID binding. Sorry, I have extremely little time available for ILNP stuff. So I don't have any time to undertake that. At a very high level, it is possible that the engineering of SHIM6 might have some similarities to the engineering of ILNP for at least some OS environments. However, the SHIM6 architecture is very different from ILNP. For openers, SHIM6 increases the semantic overloading of the IPv6 address, while ILNP eliminates that semantic overloading. Yours, Ran _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
