Tony, Thanks for the opportunity to comment. The biggest issues I've ever had with this document was that it doesn't really explain what a first class element is in this context, and the Wikipedia definition is, well, wanting. If you could provide a more detailed example of what you mean, perhaps it would be clearer. Yes, you mention tunneling, but I would suggest more detail would be helpful.
Eliot On 8/24/10 11:31 PM, Tony Li wrote: > Hi all, > > This consensus check is now closed. As of this moment, we have 16 > participants in favor via the web site, and I'm also including Brian > Carpenter as he had difficulty accessing the web site. > > This gives us a unanimous result of 17 in favor, zero against. > > Thanks to everyone in the RG for participating in this multi-year effort. > This has been interesting and contentious at times, and I think most of us > have learned substantially from one another. The result is not ideal, but is > the best that we could have reasonably achieved. > > There are some small editorial issues that need to get cleaned up. These > should become part of a -11 version that I hope to get to the IRSG in the > next day or so. > > Our next step is reach consensus on the publication of the requirements > document. The current version is here: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-rrg-design-goals-01. I realize that > this is also a contentious document, but I'm hopeful that we can, in fact, > polish this and reach a real consensus on this document. If not, we should > still publish this with the 'consensus on publication, but not on content' > disclaimer. The window for discussing this is now open. I'd like to set a > goal of closing the discussion by Sept. 15th. Please speak up now. > > Comments? Questions? > > Regards, > Tony > > > > On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Tony Li wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This concludes this final review cycle. One comment was received during >> this review cycle. This comment was editorial and was addressed, and a new >> version of the draft has been issued as >> draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-10.txt. >> >> We will now start a final consensus check on the publication of this >> document. The poll for consensus can be found here: >> >> http://www.doodle.com/3s9kihwbhbkxbnf2 >> >> This consensus check will close one week from this note. >> >> Regards, >> Tony >> >> >> >> On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Tony Li wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After much delay, I've finally finished my editorial pass over the >>> recommendation. Please see the link below. >>> >>> Please note that this pass was purely editorial. I've tried to retain the >>> same intent as the original text, but have tried to clean up the language >>> and in some cases wordsmith things just a bit. >>> >>> I would ask that we start a two week (hopefully) final review cycle. Could >>> all contributors please review the text proper one last time, as well as my >>> changes? Other reviewers are also welcome at this point. >>> >>> Diffs can be found here: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt >>> >>> and here: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt >>> >>> Comments to me or the list, as you see fit, please. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> Date: July 30, 2010 12:45:02 AM PDT >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt >>>> Reply-To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>> directories. >>>> >>>> Title : Recommendation for a Routing Architecture >>>> Author(s) : T. Li >>>> Filename : draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt >>>> Pages : 72 >>>> Date : 2010-07-30 >>>> >>>> It is commonly recognized that the Internet routing and addressing >>>> architecture is facing challenges in scalability, multihoming, and >>>> inter-domain traffic engineering. This document surveys many of the >>>> proposals that were brought forward for discussion in this activity, >>>> as well as some of the subsequent analysis. >>>> >>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt >>>> >>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>> >>>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader >>>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the >>>> Internet-Draft. >>> <Mail Attachment> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rrg mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
