Hi, [Bit heavy on the ENTER key. Oops.]
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 09:05 +0100, Tony Li wrote: > Comments to me or the list, as you see fit, please. Without looking in too much detail at -09 yet, I think a useful editorial tweak would be for each proposal to cite the relevant documents its own Summary section, or at least forward reference the appropriate subsection in section 21. I think the summary descriptions of some proposals are (necessarily) terse, but this can be offset by immediately pointing the reader at more information. For example: Section 2.2 starts abruptly with LISP-ALT, without even an expansion of the abbreviation. -S. > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: [email protected] > > Date: July 30, 2010 12:45:02 AM PDT > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: I-D Action:draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt > > Reply-To: [email protected] > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > Title : Recommendation for a Routing Architecture > > Author(s) : T. Li > > Filename : draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt > > Pages : 72 > > Date : 2010-07-30 > > > > It is commonly recognized that the Internet routing and addressing > > architecture is facing challenges in scalability, multihoming, and > > inter-domain traffic engineering. This document surveys many of the > > proposals that were brought forward for discussion in this activity, > > as well as some of the subsequent analysis. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-09.txt > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > > Internet-Draft. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
