rrg  

Messages by Date

• 2008/05/27 [RRG] Consensus? And the elephant in the room Fleischman, Eric
• 2008/05/27 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portableaddress space Fleischman, Eric
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 William Herrin
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Joel M. Halpern
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Pekka Savola
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Users will not adopt solutions which result in "split-system" functionality William Herrin
• 2008/05/26 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Ross Callon
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades William Herrin
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Identifiers & Security Associations Peter Sherbin
• 2008/05/26 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 William Herrin
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by rel... HeinerHummel
• 2008/05/26 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Tony Li
• 2008/05/26 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Eliot Lear
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] RE: What do we have consensus on? Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Tony Li
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Identifiers & Security Associations Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Identifiers & Security Associations Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Identifiers & Security Associations Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Tony Li
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] RE: What do we have consensus on? Tony Li
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Marshall Eubanks
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Router-based Translation schemes can only work with duplicate address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? Users will not adopt solutions which result in "split-system" functionality Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? Router-based Translation schemes can only work with duplicate address space Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 RE: [RRG] Consensus? Users will not adopt solutions which result in "split-system" functionality Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Consensus? Router-based Translation schemes can only work with duplicate address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Eliot Lear
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Consensus? Solution cannot require host upgrades Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/25 [RRG] Consensus? Users will not adopt solutions which result in "split-system" functionality Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/23 Re: [RRG] Re: Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/23 RE: [RRG] Meeting/session in Dublin Tony Li
• 2008/05/23 Re: [RRG] Meeting/session in Dublin Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/23 [RRG] Re: Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2008/05/23 Re: [RRG] RE: What do we have consensus on? Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/23 [RRG] Meeting/session in Dublin Iljitsch van Beijnum
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Christian Vogt
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/22 [RRG] RE: What do we have consensus on? Tony Li
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap David R Oran
• 2008/05/22 RE: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Tony Li
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap David R Oran
• 2008/05/22 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Christian Vogt
• 2008/05/22 RE: [RRG] Arguments against Transport... Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/21 [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] Arguments against Transport... Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] Feasibility of transport based approaches? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Joel M. Halpern
• 2008/05/21 RE: [RRG] Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Tony Li
• 2008/05/21 RE: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Tony Li
• 2008/05/21 [RRG] Arguments against Transport, Translation & Six/One Router Robin Whittle
• 2008/05/21 RE: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Templin, Fred L
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap David R Oran
• 2008/05/21 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Christian Vogt
• 2008/05/21 [RRG] Update on Six/One Router + A Call for Your Comments Christian Vogt
• 2008/05/20 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap David R Oran
• 2008/05/19 RE: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Templin, Fred L
• 2008/05/19 Re: [RRG] RRG materials from 71th IETF meeting Lixia Zhang
• 2008/05/19 Re: [RRG] RRG materials from 71th IETF meeting Xiaoming Fu
• 2008/05/18 Re: [RRG] Comments to Draft-lewis-lisp-interworking Dino Farinacci
• 2008/05/18 [RRG] RRG materials from 71th IETF meeting Eduardo Ascenco Reis
• 2008/05/18 RE: [RRG] RE: Feasibility of transport based approaches? Tony Li
• 2008/05/18 Re: [RRG] Feasibility of transport based approaches? marcelo bagnulo braun
• 2008/05/18 [RRG] RE: Feasibility of transport based approaches? Randall Atkinson
• 2008/05/18 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Christian Vogt
• 2008/05/18 [RRG] Comments to Draft-lewis-lisp-interworking hannu.flinck
• 2008/05/18 [RRG] Feasibility of transport based approaches? hannu.flinck
• 2008/05/11 RE: [RRG] interesting presentations from RIPE Per Heldal

• Later messages