rrg

Messages by Date

2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/19 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... William Herrin
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... David R Oran
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/19 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/19 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Michael Meisel
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Joel M. Halpern
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Lixia Zhang
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... William Herrin
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... William Herrin
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Lixia Zhang
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? David R Oran
2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Robin Whittle
2008/06/18 RE: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Tony Li
2008/06/18 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Lixia Zhang
2008/06/18 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Lixia Zhang
2008/06/18 [RRG] Origins of LISP PTRs / Ivip OITRDs Robin Whittle
2008/06/18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [RRG] Moving forward...] Vince Fuller
2008/06/18 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Vince Fuller
2008/06/18 RE: [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Templin, Fred L
2008/06/15 [RRG] Not address but topology aggregation HeinerHummel
2008/06/14 Re: [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Robin Whittle
2008/06/13 RE: [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Tony Li
2008/06/13 [RRG] the agenda for Dublin Lixia Zhang
2008/06/13 Re: [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Robin Whittle
2008/06/13 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/13 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/13 GSE, Six/One, and Beyond --- Re: [RRG] GSE? Christian Vogt
2008/06/13 re: [RRG] Re: address reclamation Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/13 Re: [RRG] GSE History Scott Brim
2008/06/13 Re: [RRG] Re: address reclamation Scott Brim
2008/06/13 [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Robin Whittle
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] Schedule Jari Arkko
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] GSE? Lixia Zhang
2008/06/12 re: [RRG] GSE? Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/12 re: [RRG] GSE? Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/12 RE: [RRG] GSE? Tony Li
2008/06/12 [RRG] Schedule Tony Li
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] Re: address reclamation Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] GSE? Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv6 immediate benefits to some end-users? David Conrad
2008/06/12 [RRG] Re: IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng David Conrad
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Tom Vest
2008/06/12 RE: [RRG] IPv6 immediate benefits to some end-users? Templin, Fred L
2008/06/12 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhapsmoreambitious Templin, Fred L
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Robin Whittle
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] Re: address reclamation Jason Schiller
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] GSE History Noel Chiappa
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] Re: address reclamation Per Heldal
2008/06/12 [RRG] Re: address reclamation RJ Atkinson
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Per Heldal
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] GSE? Noel Chiappa
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Robin Whittle
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Per Heldal
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Robin Whittle
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Per Heldal
2008/06/12 Re: [RRG] IPv6 immediate benefits to some end-users? Jeroen Massar
2008/06/11 [RRG] IPv4/6/ngng or IPv4-map-encap then IPngng Robin Whittle
2008/06/11 re: [RRG] GSE? Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/11 [RRG] IPv6 immediate benefits to some end-users? Robin Whittle
2008/06/11 re: [RRG] GSE? Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE? David Conrad
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE? Robin Whittle
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE History Peter Sherbin
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhapsmore ambitious Robin Whittle
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE? Peter Sherbin
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE History Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE History Templin, Fred L
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE History Tony Li
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE History Templin, Fred L
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE History Tony Li
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE History Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/11 [RRG] GSE History RJ Atkinson
2008/06/11 RE: [RRG] GSE? Tony Li
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] GSE? Mayutan A.
2008/06/11 [RRG] GSE? Robin Whittle
2008/06/11 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008/06/10 RE: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption Tony Li
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious William Herrin
2008/06/10 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhapsmore ambitious Templin, Fred L
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious William Herrin
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption David Conrad
2008/06/10 [RRG] Re: reachability RJ Atkinson
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Jeroen Massar
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Marshall Eubanks
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious William Herrin
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/10 [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption Robin Whittle
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Robin Whittle
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Jeroen Massar
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Per Heldal
2008/06/10 re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/10 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Tony Li
2008/06/10 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Robin Whittle
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] arguments for map and encap Michael Meisel
2008/06/09 re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Dan Jen
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Tony Li
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Tony Li
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] reachability Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Robin Whittle
2008/06/09 re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Xu Xiaohu
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious William Herrin
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] reachability Tony Li
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] reachability Bob Hinden
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Marshall Eubanks
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Bob Hinden
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious David Conrad
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Tony Li
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious Robin Whittle
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Ross Callon
2008/06/09 [RRG] reachability RJ Atkinson
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/09 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/09 [RRG] Tony's proposed statement RJ Atkinson
2008/06/09 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008/06/08 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Brian E Carpenter
2008/06/08 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Peter Sherbin
2008/06/07 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/07 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Christian Vogt
2008/06/07 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Christian Vogt
2008/06/07 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dan Jen
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Christian Vogt
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Christian Vogt
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Christian Vogt
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... David Williamson
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Olivier Bonaventure
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Joel M. Halpern
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Noel Chiappa
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Dino Farinacci
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Templin, Fred L
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Joel M. Halpern
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/06 RE: [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Scott Brim
2008/06/06 [RRG] Moving forward... Tony Li
2008/06/06 Geographical aggregation, was: Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008/06/04 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Robin Whittle
2008/06/02 [RRG] CFP ReArch'08 marcelo bagnulo braun
2008/06/02 [RRG] CFP ReArch'08 marcelo bagnulo braun
2008/05/31 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Robin Whittle
2008/05/31 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Noel Chiappa
2008/05/30 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Robin Whittle
2008/05/29 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/29 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? David R Oran
2008/05/29 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Scott Brim
2008/05/29 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Scott Brim
2008/05/29 RE: [RRG] Embedded systems Fleischman, Eric
2008/05/29 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Peter Sherbin
2008/05/29 RE: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Templin, Fred L
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Robin Whittle
2008/05/28 Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/28 [RRG] Embedded systems Randall Atkinson
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Christian Vogt
2008/05/28 RE: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Randall Atkinson
2008/05/28 RE: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) Randall Atkinson
2008/05/28 RE: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Fleischman, Eric
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] Try again HeinerHummel
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] Try again Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/28 Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) Peter Sherbin
2008/05/28 Re: [RRG] Try again HeinerHummel
2008/05/28 [RRG] Try again David Conrad
2008/05/28 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Tony Li
2008/05/28 RE: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Tony Li
2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6 Lixia Zhang
2008/05/27 [RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6 Robin Whittle
2008/05/27 [RRG] Consensus? 4 points so we can make progress Robin Whittle
2008/05/27 [RRG] Re: We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6 Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/27 [RRG] Consensus? Scope of "It" in "Doing It Right" Robin Whittle
2008/05/27 [RRG] We can't bet the Internet on the imminent adoption of IPv6 Robin Whittle
2008/05/27 [RRG] Multi-homing & Changing IP address Randall Atkinson
2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
2008/05/27 Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) David Conrad
2008/05/27 Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) Brian E Carpenter
2008/05/27 Re: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) David Conrad
2008/05/27 RE: "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) Fleischman, Eric
2008/05/27 Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem must be solved directly, not by relying on migration to IPv6 Peter Sherbin
2008/05/27 "Doing It Right" (was Re: [RRG] Consensus? IPv4 scaling problem ...) David Conrad