I support this suggestion. Neutral background would be necessary for one eligible for this committee.
-Hui 2007/12/13, Tony Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > As we all agree, RRG meeting time is our most limited resource, and > perhaps also the most effective means to facilitate our convergence > process. Thus, we would like to allocate adequate amount of time for > discussions in our future meetings. Consequently, we need to be more > selective on the presentations of new proposals. We would like to > reiterate that the floor remains open for new proposals, so new > proposals may still be submitted as a draft and considered on the > mailing list. However, we would like to ensure that only high > quality proposals with substantive novelty will take group-wide time. > > To assist us in this, the chairs plan to form a "program committee". > These would be interested members who are respected architectural > contributors. For a proposal to be considered for an agenda slot, > the backers of the proposal should approach members of this committee > and ask them to review their proposal. Committee members that have a > conflict of interest (e.g., same employer) should recuse themselves. > If any member of the committee feels that the presentation is > worthwhile, it will be placed on the agenda, time permitting. The > identity of the endorsing member will be made public. > > We would deeply appreciate your comments on this proposal. > > Regards, > Lixia & Tony > > -- > to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the > word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. > archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg > -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
