I think its a good idea to think about what proposals deserve meeting time, particularly if there are many new ones. And it might not always be clear whether all proposals are actually addressing the scalability problem that we should be talking about.
I would suggest, however, that this is only a part of the problem. I'd like to see more of the meeting time spent on *discussion* of the issues rather than presentation of the proposals. And in general, the problem is perhaps not so much in whether we give time for some new proposals in the agenda, but rather in getting a proposal that has been presented to an actually workable solution. I suspect that's where 98% of the effort lies in :-) Jari -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
