Bill, thanks a lot for your comments. I think, however, there is a basic misunderstanding. Let me clarify:
DNS Map handles mapping resolution /separately/ from regular domain name resolution. It uses separate DNS queries and different DNS resource records. Regular domain name resolution continues to be pursued by hosts or, on their behalf, by DNS servers. Mapping resolution may be performed by Six/One routers (you called them "ITRs"). But for the benefit of deployment flexibility, DNS Map does not stipulate who should perform mapping resolution. It may be performed by another network entity that makes the mappings available to Six/One routers afterwards. This is why neither the use of different DNS resolvers in hosts and Six/One routers, nor reordering of equal-priority resource records, nor caching should be a problem. Let me know if this helped. - Christian -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
