> Regular domain name resolution continues to be pursued by hosts or, > on their behalf, by DNS servers. Mapping resolution may be performed > by Six/One routers (you called them "ITRs"). But for the benefit of > deployment flexibility, DNS Map does not stipulate who should perform > mapping resolution. It may be performed by another network entity > that makes the mappings available to Six/One routers afterwards.
Hi Christian, Provided that the mapping resolution is performed by hosts, what should the mapping entry be? EID-based mapping entry (e.g.10.1.1.1/32) or EID-prefix-based mapping entry (e.g.10.1.1.0/24)? If the former is adopted, there will be a big challenge on the cache size of ITR, if the latter is adopted, how can the ITR trust the mapping that hosts provide? Best wishes, Xiaohu XU -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
