Alright. I guess a priority field in MAP records would do the job.
It would allow MAP records to be reordered arbitrarily without
losing priority information.
Should you do so, remember that RFC 2782 already specifies such a
mechanism so it could be a better idea to build on it, specially since
it is already implemented in resolvers (for instance the RULI
library).
Yep, point taken.
- Christian
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
