Hi Brian,
|I realised that this apparent disagreement is because we've |been implictly assuming that the only valid taxonomy for solutions |is a hierarchy. If you root your hierarchy in the upper layer |viewpoint, you get a different tree than if you root it in |the routing viewpoint. | |What we actually need is a facet-based taxonomy. That is what |someone (Melinda Shore, to be precise) pointed out to Scott Brim |and me when we were developing RFC 3234. If we describe things |that way, I suspect we won't disagree at all. | |[Google will find lots of stuff about facet-based taxonomies, |and their inventor S.R. Ranganathan, e.g. |http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html ] Thank you very much. I think that's very intriguing. I encourage other folks to check it out. Tony -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
