Perhaps we should first agree that there is a need a *short term*
solution for both IPv4 and IPv6. The following (from Tony's e-mail
on 5/26/2008) is relevant to the discussion on whether there is
such a need:
Well, Ross Callon has been quoted as saying that the Juniper
implementation will have no problems up through many millions
of routes.
Now, conceptually, that could happen tomorrow. However, at the
current growth rates, that's likely to be many years.
The routing table size problem is not the only problem. There are many
enterprise sites that want to do low-cost multihoming, they want to be
good citizens to the Internet and don't want to inject more specifics,
and they want to control their ingress traffic flows.
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
